Dynamic relationships between individuals and groups have been a focus for evolutionary theorists and modelers for decades. Among evolutionists, selfish gene theory promotes reductionist approaches while multilevel selection theory encourages a context-sensitive approach that appreciates that individuals and groups can both matter. Among economists, a comparable contrast is found wherein the reductionist shareholder primacy theory most associated with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman is very different from the context-sensitive focus on managing common resources that Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom pioneered. In this article, we examine whether the core design principles that Ostrom advanced can cultivate selection at supra-individual levels across different domains. We show that Ostrom’s design principles that were forged in the context of managing natural resources are associated with positive outcomes for human social groups across a variety of functional domains.
Core Design Principles for Nurturing Organization-level Selection
Other Publications
-
Williams' Rule and Its Relevance for Positive Change Efforts
Nov 14, 2025
Abstract Nearly every individual and society seeks to work toward positive change, but these efforts often perversely result in dysfunctional outcomes, especially when different aspirations collide with each other. This… -
Performance management in the prosocial market economy: a new paradigm for economic performance and sustainability
Nov 13, 2025
Purpose The purpose of this multi-voiced paper is to propose a prosocial paradigm for the field of performance management and management control systems. This new paradigm suggests cultivating prosocial behaviour… -
Evolutionary Mismatch and How To Evaluate It: A Basic Tutorial
Nov 13, 2025
ABSTRACT: Evolutionary mismatch is a state of disequilibrium whereby an organism that evolved in one environment develops a phenotype that is harmful to its fitness or well-being in another environment.…